undefined

Clinical decision‐making processes among graduate nurses, specialist nurses and nurse practitioners A collaborative international study

Publiceringsår

2024

Upphovspersoner

Levy‐Malmberg, Rika; Boman, Erika; Lehwaldt, Daniela; Fagerström, Lisbeth; Lockwood, Emily B

Abstrakt

<p>Aim: To explore clinical decision-making by comparing the processes used by three groups of nurses in the emergency departments of three hospitals: in Norway, Finland and Ireland. Background: Clinical decision-making in an emergency department environment is a complex process often occurring in times of crisis. It is an important aspect contributing to the quality of care. However, empirical research is limited regarding the decision-making process in different nursing roles. Methods: In accordance with the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research, a qualitative and observational study was conducted to explore clinical decision-making by comparing the processes used by three groups of nurses in the emergency departments of three hospitals: in Norway, Finland and Ireland. Six Registered Nurses, six Nurse Specialists and six Nurse Practitioners were observed. A total of 40 hours of observation was made at each setting according to a structured observation guideline, followed by clarifying questions. The data material was analysed by means of a qualitative manifest and latent content analysis. Results: Three themes arose: acting in accordance with routines, previous experience and intuition; considering patient experience; and facilitating new alternatives based on critical thinking. The Registered Nurses mainly used the first approach, the Nurse Specialists used the first and the second approaches, and the Nurse Practitioners used all three approaches. Conclusions: The results highlight the differences in decision-making processes between these groups. Nurse Practitioners were the only group that facilitated and evaluated new alternatives using their clinical autonomy, such as stepping up and making independent and collaborative decision-making. Implication: The results can be used in countries developing advanced practice nursing education and defining their scope of practice to inform stakeholders.</p>
Visa mer

Organisationer och upphovspersoner

Yrkeshögskolan Novia

Levy-Malmberg Rika Orcid -palvelun logo

Åbo Akademi

Fagerström Lisbeth

Publikationstyp

Publikationsform

Artikel

Moderpublikationens typ

Tidning

Artikelstyp

En originalartikel

Målgrupp

Vetenskaplig

Kollegialt utvärderad

Kollegialt utvärderad

UKM:s publikationstyp

A1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift

Publikationskanalens uppgifter

Förläggare

Wiley

Volym

71

Nummer

2

Sidor

224-231

Publikationsforum

58945

Publikationsforumsnivå

2

Öppen tillgång

Öppen tillgänglighet i förläggarens tjänst

Ja

Öppen tillgång till publikationskanalen

Delvis öppen publikationskanal

Licens för förläggarens version

CC BY NC ND

Parallellsparad

Ja

Övriga uppgifter

Vetenskapsområden

Vårdvetenskap; Hälsovetenskap

Nyckelord

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Förlagets internationalitet

Internationell

Språk

engelska

Internationell sampublikation

Ja

Sampublikation med ett företag

Nej

DOI

10.1111/inr.12951

Publikationen ingår i undervisnings- och kulturministeriets datainsamling

Ja