Clinical decision‐making processes among graduate nurses, specialist nurses and nurse practitioners A collaborative international study
Publiceringsår
2024
Upphovspersoner
Levy‐Malmberg, Rika; Boman, Erika; Lehwaldt, Daniela; Fagerström, Lisbeth; Lockwood, Emily B
Abstrakt
<p>Aim: To explore clinical decision-making by comparing the processes used by three groups of nurses in the emergency departments of three hospitals: in Norway, Finland and Ireland. Background: Clinical decision-making in an emergency department environment is a complex process often occurring in times of crisis. It is an important aspect contributing to the quality of care. However, empirical research is limited regarding the decision-making process in different nursing roles. Methods: In accordance with the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research, a qualitative and observational study was conducted to explore clinical decision-making by comparing the processes used by three groups of nurses in the emergency departments of three hospitals: in Norway, Finland and Ireland. Six Registered Nurses, six Nurse Specialists and six Nurse Practitioners were observed. A total of 40 hours of observation was made at each setting according to a structured observation guideline, followed by clarifying questions. The data material was analysed by means of a qualitative manifest and latent content analysis. Results: Three themes arose: acting in accordance with routines, previous experience and intuition; considering patient experience; and facilitating new alternatives based on critical thinking. The Registered Nurses mainly used the first approach, the Nurse Specialists used the first and the second approaches, and the Nurse Practitioners used all three approaches. Conclusions: The results highlight the differences in decision-making processes between these groups. Nurse Practitioners were the only group that facilitated and evaluated new alternatives using their clinical autonomy, such as stepping up and making independent and collaborative decision-making. Implication: The results can be used in countries developing advanced practice nursing education and defining their scope of practice to inform stakeholders.</p>
Visa merOrganisationer och upphovspersoner
Åbo Akademi
Fagerström Lisbeth
Publikationstyp
Publikationsform
Artikel
Moderpublikationens typ
Tidning
Artikelstyp
En originalartikel
Målgrupp
VetenskapligKollegialt utvärderad
Kollegialt utvärderadUKM:s publikationstyp
A1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskriftPublikationskanalens uppgifter
Journal/Serie
Förläggare
Volym
71
Nummer
2
Sidor
224-231
ISSN
Publikationsforum
Publikationsforumsnivå
2
Öppen tillgång
Öppen tillgänglighet i förläggarens tjänst
Ja
Öppen tillgång till publikationskanalen
Delvis öppen publikationskanal
Licens för förläggarens version
CC BY NC ND
Parallellsparad
Ja
Övriga uppgifter
Vetenskapsområden
Vårdvetenskap; Hälsovetenskap
Nyckelord
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Förlagets internationalitet
Internationell
Språk
engelska
Internationell sampublikation
Ja
Sampublikation med ett företag
Nej
DOI
10.1111/inr.12951
Publikationen ingår i undervisnings- och kulturministeriets datainsamling
Ja